Does anyone have any pointers on how to go about creating a "wizard interface" using Access 2010? I need a sequential set of forms that will be capable of branching the flow based on answers from the user and data found in the database. I have used Access before for some CRUD/Reports type of applications, but in this case I can't seem to wrap my head around how to get started on such a complex machine.
Before anyone suggests it, I cannot use anything but Access due to client requirements.
I feel your pain ... working with Access gets so difficult where there are complex requirements.
Gather and document the requirements
Make sure you've teased out every possible wrinkle and contingency from the client, and put it into a flow chart or something.
Extract the models
Figure out what models are being used -- customers, addresses, vendors, products, etc. These will have to be created as tables or adapted to existing ones.
Extract other variables
What could potentially change over time and/or what will the client want to be able to change via an admin screen? You'll have to decide which of these variables to put into tables, and which are ok in the code (form logic and/or VBA).
Design the tables for the wizard views
I imagine you'll want a wizard screens table, where each row corresponds to a step; each should have (other than an id column) a previous screen column, and a form name or form template name column. You'll need a second table choices with a many-to-one foreign key linking back to screens; each row here will correspond to a possible outcome of the view, and the target next step in the wizard.
Design the forms
Finally, design the forms corresponding to each wizard step or template, pulling data from the structures in 1-4 as needed.
Related
I am developing a access database front-end, where the database resides in SharePoint list. There is a Attendance Table with AttDate and StaffID columns apart from other columns.
Want to achieve: Only one record is added per staff for a day. i.e. only One Attendance is recorded in a day. When user tries to enter attendance of same staff again on same day, he should get error.
When the back-end was in Access file, I had created an index with 2 columns, and made the index "allow unique values only". The screen looks like this.
Now when, I am moving my back-end to SharePoint, I was expecting same functionality. But, moving Tables to SharePoint using Access 2013 wizard did not create the index. Hence I thought creating it manually will solve the problem. So, I created an index with 2 columns, See screenshot below.
When I entered data, it still allows multiple values , see Screenshot
below
Please help, as to what can be the solution to this problem. I am
allowed to change existing table structure, if the solution so
demands. Any workaround will also be helpful.
SharePoint indexing is more about making it faster to retrieve and search for items in SharePoint. It has nothing to do with unique constraints.
You're going to have to add something to your SharePoint instance that will perform this check for you.
You haven't mentioned whether you're using SharePoint on-line or on-premise. You do say that you're using the Access front-end. This typically means you'll need to use an event receiver which will involve C# (or VB.NET) programming.
Workflows wouldn't prevent the duplicate row from being saved
JavaScript would help if using SharePoint UI, but won't prevent services
You do mention that you're using an Access front-end. Maybe you can add some business logic in your Access file?
Hope this helps
I am working on project in economy where I need to manage large data in linked tables, with many foreign keys.
I have a few years of experience as Oracle DBA so I can manage all that without problem,
But I need to be able to share the data with others that have no knowledge in databasing,
There for I need to get them some graphic way to show the data.
Toad does all what I need and much more, but the program is too complicated for my needs.
Instead of wasting time on writing a program in C# that manages the data, I am looking for a good program that:
Shows Main table/view data with option to filter/group/order with drop-box options
Selects a row and shows data in linked tables by the selected row's data
Makes report/data pages of my selected rows that I can adjust and print. (I know it's a bigger request)
In Addition, what is the most fit and easy DB for it? I worked only with Oracle but it's sure too much for that, so MySql? Access (I tried first to do all that in Access program but It's just too hard to adjust forms and so, and in the end you cannot make a publish version.
And the tables will be with start_date and finish_date that follow each other for same ID,
But I don't think it will be a problem that I can maximum make view that shows only the last one. (BTW, what is the name of such table, I never knew that)
Take a look at Tableau http://www.tableausoftware.com
It will let users view the data many different ways, makes great visualizations and works with most databases. It's a read-only tool, so it's perfect for safe reporting, but you'll need to couple it with something else if you want your users to make changes to the data.
You can define a connection in Tableau that sets up the relationships for users that don't understand foreign keys and the like. Or make views that hide those details, of course, regardless of the tool you choose.
I am making a semi-simple web application for my mother using php, mysql, and javascript.
She is a teacher, and this wil allow her to manage various components of her lesson plans.
For each component there is a table, and for each component that can contain another component there is another table that holds the relationship. (That table type has two columns each has a foreign key to the related tables)
I am nearly done, but she now wants to allow her friends to use this, I don't care too much about sql injection, but I would like to implement User Control so that only users that create a component can view and edit that component.
I also want them to be able to make public components, so that users can copy components to their own dataset.
My question To implement the user control should I have each user have there own database instant, or should each table have an owner column and column for public/private status, or is there another alternative that I have not thought of.
An issue that I see is that it would require additional mysql query when creating the relations between components because I would need to check that both components user tag matches the current user.
Any feedback/suggestions are helpful
Update The only people using/accessing this will be other teachers, that will be developing their own lesson plans
I would certainly implement this within the same database. Having a different database for each user is not a good solution in this case. Think, for example, how you would build a search function if each user's data is in a separate database will clashing UIDs. It would be a nightmare. Separate databases work where each database serves a separate application and there are precisely zero relations between the data in different databases.
So that brings you on to how to implement it. This will depend on your model. Will each lesson plan only ever have, for example, one and only one owner? If so, then adding that info to the components table might work. Or else you might need a separate table to define ownership and hence access to the different components. Either way, I would make sure the access logic is decoupled and encapsulated in your application to make sure you can change it in the future. Imagine for example you start with a simple, single-owner model but the site grows and grows and soon groups of people all need ownership/edit access to components.
First a background. Our application is built on ASP.NET MVC3, .NET 4.0, and uses Linq-to-Sql (PLINQO) as its primary means of data access. Our web application is a multi-tenant/multi-client system where each client gets their own Sql Server database. Each Sql Server database up to now has had exactly the same schema.
Often times, clients will ask us to track custom fields in their Db that other clients don't track. The way we've handled this is by reserving a number of customfields in the db in our main tables. For example, our Widget table may have a CustomText1, CustomText2.. CustomText10, and a CustomDate1, CustomDate2..CustomDate10 fields. Again, all our schemas across clients are the same, so Linq-to-Sql handles these fields just as easily as any other field.
Now we are running into an issue where a client wants several hundred CustomBool fields, but doesn't need the others. So, basically, we are researching for ways to still use the Linq-to-Sql, but have it work against potentially different schemas depending on the database it is connected to (although they are different in a very specific way.)
Too much code has already been built on Linq-to-Sql and accessing the Widget classes generated by it that I'd like to not just fall back to straight SQL.
I've seen answers here and on the web on ways for Linq to Sql to access different tables that have the same schema, but I have not found a good answer to the same table name across different dbs with different columns.
Is this possible?
If the main objective is to store a few extra fields for existing domain objects then why not create a generic table that can store key value pairs. This is extremely flexible since there is no need to change your schema if a customer requires a new property.
We do this frequently and normally have some helpers to correctly cast the properties e.g.
Service.GetProperty<bool>("SomeCustomProperty")
If you are looking for a more "pluggable" domain model that can be completely different for each tenant, I think you will struggle if you are following a database driven approach and using the L2S designer to generate your code.
To achieve this you really need to be generating your database based on your code (domain driven design) which will give you much more flexibility i.e. you can load a tenant specific configuration (set of classes, business rules etc.) at runtime and use this to generate/validate your schema.
Update
It would be good if you could elaborate on exactly what design approach you have taken i.e. are you using the Linq designer and generating your model from the database?
It's clear that a generic key value pair store is not going to meet your querying requirements.
It's hard to provide a solution without suggesting a different technology. Relational SQL databases aren't really suited for dynamic domain models. You may be better off with a document database such as MongoDb or RavenDb where you are not tied to a specific schema. You could even make use of these just for your custom properties.
If that's not ideal then another solution would be to use something like Dapper to construct your queries. Assuming you are developing against interfaces you can have a implementation of your data service per tenant that makes use of their custom fields.
Ayende did a whole series of posts on Multitenancy and covers tenant specific domain models. It starts here and may be of some use to you.
I'm trying to split a database into two pieces -- a backend that updates automatically, and a front-end that allows searching and adding/editing comments. The data in the source database is pulled together from multiple tables into a pair of queries, and I want to use these queries as the source of the current database.
Access 2007 supports splitting a database into multiple pieces, but not in the way I'm looking for. It keeps the tables in the source database and puts all the forms, queries, reports, and macros into the new database. The tables and queries are already in the back-end, and this new database should just provide a good GUI to the end-user.
Access 2007 also supports linked tables, but these can only use a table as a source, not a query object.
I was thinking that the best way to do this would be to do a SQL query along the lines of
SELECT * FROM SourceQuery IN "C:\Path\To\ExternalDB.accdb";
Is what I'm working towards even possible, and would this be the best way to do it?
Since its still relatively early in the project, rearchitecting the database isn't out of the question, but is something I'd prefer to avoid.
You described the usual Access BE-FE division correctly: only tables in the back-end. I'm aware not all DB programs do it that way, but this is Access and my approach would be to honor the usual division. (And you hardly have a choice in that you can't "link to a query" in Access.)
Reviewing your comment ('There is a specific reason ...'), I think this would possibly mean
adding a few more tables to the back-end, essentially buckets (import-data in ready form; export 1; export 2) that allow all users to get to consistent processed data;
making a small admin FE that sits next to the BE and stores your modules, queries for export, and export routines; and
having some redundant queries on the user FE. This is vexing in my own work. I just try to design sturdy stable "building block" queries in those roles, and keep their number to a minimum.
Hope I'm understanding you correctly, but the most sensible solution would be to link the tables in the backend DB and copy the queries to the UI database. Those queries would still be able to access the uderlying tables (via the linked tables) without issues and would be accessible through normal means to your forms and VBA code.
Is there a particular reason you don't want the queries in the UI database?